But the 15-year-olds will love us!
That's not my opinion... I'm just reporting our scientifically-derived blog rating as calculated here. That puts us a rung above Paris Hilton on the reading level ladder, but, alas, a rung under Perez Hilton.
What can we do about this? I, for one, intend to ameliorate our valuation via articulating my suppositions by the usage of a higher number of obscure, arcane, and enigmatic words.
Oh - have I mentioned that Wikipedia now claims that the Schur multiplier is usually defined as the second homology group of a group G with coefficients in the integers?!? Come on, Wikipedia - give me a break!
Labels: academic contests, meta, not Canada
posted by Robert at
4:07 PM
14 Comments:
i don't think bernie's posts about pretzels and chips are helping us.
But is it appropriate for junior high school readers? Just in the past few weeks we have "Tony La Russa is a passive aggressive fuck" and multiple depictions of smoking.
Frank, that's exactly why we need to move up a few levels. We have to scare the little fuckers off!
I do think John's salty language is inappropriate.
Also, it can't be that much of an algorithm; it takes about two seconds before it delivers a verdict.
i think bernie posting about salty snacks is inappropriate.
> it can't be that much of an algorithm...
Bernie, we wouldn't have this problem if you'd use words like algorithm in your postings instead of just in your comments.
Robert- I think it's a simple random number generator dishing out the levels.
But we always get the same rating!
Can you find an erudite site that it accurately identifies?
OK, Robert, I did find a wbsite at the "genius" level-- can you?
topangaonline.com: genius
ouch.
Another genius level blog: http://www.criticsrant.com/bb/reading_level.aspx
I love recursion!
Post a Comment
<< Home