Saturday, February 23, 2008

Curse You, Patrick Moberg


I was intrigued by the tale of Patrick Moberg. He was the wonderboy who created a website a few months back to find the "girl of his dreams" who he'd spotted on the New York subway. And, by gum, he found her! The Internet was all a-buzz—as it is wont to do—and the happy couple even appeared on Good Morning America. Moberg was a flavor of the minute, and the story was forgotten as quickly as it appeared.

But not forgotten by everyone. Young master Moberg may not have considered a sinister consequence of his seemingly innocent romantic quest: Providing entirely too much hope to we legions of pathetic guys who stare at women on public transportation. The following true story takes place a mere two days after I watched
the infamous GMA appearance in a Houston hotel room.


With Moberg on my mind, I am on the PATH train platform at Newark Penn Station on Sunday night, returning from a trip. I see a pretty girl. A plain pretty girl. My "type." I think, I'll get on the same train car as her.

And I do. She sits in the corner. Should I sit near her? No, I'll stand, with my suitcase, a safe distance away.

She starts reading a magazine. The image—the girl, the hair, the posture, the magazine—is extremely appealing to me. I decide to clandestinely document it on my cellphone camera.

I figure I should take a close-up too. For good measure.

Hmmm. I calculate the odds. There's about a 10% chance she'll transfer at Journal Square to a Hoboken train. If she does, maybe I'll talk to her. If it's the New Yorker, definitely. But doesn't quite look like the New Yorker. Could be a fashion magazine.

Journal Square. She gets off the train. I get off the train. There's a waiting-at-the-end-of-the-line Hoboken-bound train across the platform. But there's not an obvious car straight across for both of us to enter. I take a chance and choose first. She doesn't follow me. I'm sad.

"Joaquin," calls one of the friendly employees from the Spa Diner, where I am a regular. I don't know his name. I explain that there was a "mujer bonita" on the "otra tren." But where she is now, I don't know. I am a little "triste."

I get off the train in Hoboken, go up the first flight of stairs, approach the exit, and—wait, I recognize that jacket, that bag, those black tights, that longish-dirty-blonde hair that is the trademark of 1/3 of the women I am attracted to. She exits first. She takes the steps to ground level TWO STEPS AT A TIME. Wild.

Is she walking home? No, she's headed to the taxi line. I planned to walk but, now I must also take a taxi. I bid "buenos noches" to my diner friend, who must begin his shift.

Now I am standing behind her in the taxi line.

I am nervous.

First cab pulls up. "Fourth and Madison," she says. This cabbie refuses: Most cabs take three passengers, but the first determines which section of town they will drive to.

So if a cab accepts her and still has room for me, WE WILL RIDE TOGETHER. Fourth and Madison being one block south, two blocks west of me. And since I won't be asking for the same exact intersection, it won't TOTALLY seem like I'm stalking her. It's what they would call a "happy coincidence."

That’s how it goes down. I am SHARING A BACK SEAT WITH HER.

She buckles up. Backseat buckling is for wusses but I do it. I buckle up. But will I buckle down, or buckle under?

As we drive into the Hoboken night, I think, "Man, it's fucking creepy that I have two photos of this girl on my phone."

And then I think, I should say something.

There's a third passenger, in the front seat. A woman. I am not attracted to her.

I think, how can I talk to one without talking to everyone? What would Moberg do?

Maybe we'll drop off Front-Seaty first.

No.

We're headed to my street first.

Fuck.

I haven't said anything.

Maybe I'll say something as I get out.

But I don't.

Fuck.

Not even "goodnight."

I am angry at myself.

I am triste.

Later I post one of those pathetic "missed connection" messages on craigslist.
But there is no reply.
No reply at all, as Genesis once sang.
This is the time of no reply, said Nick Drake.

And the wind cries Moberg.

Labels: , , , ,

52 Comments:

Blogger John Levenstein said...

i don't know how to spin this as a triumph

February 23, 2008 3:37 PM  
Blogger Robert said...

Jack, if it's any consolation, I had a similar experience 25 years ago or so. I met a woman at a party; we talked for a bit; she left. I tried to track her down but couldn't and was really bummed about it for awhile.

Three or four months later I was in a bookstore and the woman behind the counter looked vaguely familiar. We talked and it turned out she was the woman from the party. We wound up getting together for a couple of months; it didn't work out AT ALL. She wanted me to do things that I just wasn't into - like when I went on a trip to Washington DC a month or so in, she wanted me to mail her some of my sperm so she could rub it on her body. Besides the transport issues (USPS? FedEx), it just wasn't my thing. Go ahead, call me a freak.

Hey, you know how I said at the start of this if it's any consolation....? I understand that it won't be. :(

February 23, 2008 5:40 PM  
Blogger Robert said...

Also what was I supposed to put it in? A vial? Where does one get a vial? I'm a guy, I don't know these things.

February 23, 2008 6:01 PM  
Blogger John Levenstein said...

jack, in the pictures, it looks a little like she's flirting with you. she's not being obvious, because she's got class.

February 23, 2008 6:24 PM  
Blogger Kristen said...

Wow Jack, that's sort of creepy. But I agree with John, she seems to be subtlety flirting with you so hopefully you run into her again.

And Robert, you could probably buy a vial at CVS or a similar drugstore...

February 23, 2008 7:45 PM  
Blogger Jack Silbert said...

Robert, I think a Ziploc bag would work fine. The postage would be less than a vial, anyway.

February 23, 2008 9:48 PM  
Blogger 20Tauri said...

Wow, dude. That's definitely creepy. If I were that girl and I'd found out you taken two pictures of me, I would definitely NOT be attracted to that, no matter how cute you are! By the way, if by "it looks a little like she's flirting with you" the previous poster(s) meant "she actually looks like she's completely ignoring you" then that would make sense, cuz what they actually did say doesn't ;) Where do you get from those two pictures any idea of flirtation?

That said...I can't believe you didn't *say* something to her?!

February 23, 2008 11:17 PM  
Blogger Robert said...

Jack, I think what 20tauri is trying to say is that the girl on the train totally wants you.

February 23, 2008 11:59 PM  
Blogger frank b. said...

This reminds me of my favorite New Yorker cover. Two people on adjacent trains, both reading the same book, make eye contact. The man even looks like Jack.

February 24, 2008 5:20 AM  
Blogger frank b. said...

Jack, it seems to me you need props. Something that looks potentially valuable, but really isn't, that you could have left on the seat of the cab. I'm not sure what that would be, exactly, but serendipity requires preparation.

February 24, 2008 5:30 AM  
Blogger John Levenstein said...

i once saw a cosmo article advising women who want to meet men on the subway to carry something large and look helpless.

February 24, 2008 7:03 AM  
Blogger John Levenstein said...

wow, now 20tauri is flirting with jack. it's even more obvious than a woman not making eye contact on the subway.

February 24, 2008 7:04 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i would guess she is probably not so attracted to the profanity, honestly.

February 25, 2008 8:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

that was one of the most eloquently written articles on stalking that i have ever read. bravo!

February 25, 2008 8:43 AM  
Blogger Chris said...

First off, 20tauri is back! And lest anyone not understand the intent of her words, let the all caps be a reminder... SHE IS SERIOUS.

anonymous... what? Fucking hell.

February 25, 2008 9:23 AM  
Blogger rdalfonso said...

This guy is a loser. If you like the girl just talk to her. Woman aren't an alien species, they just girls. If they like you they'll talk back. If not, they won't. Regret is always worse than rejection and this guy's antics, if they haven't broken any laws, are pathetic.

February 25, 2008 9:46 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If I wasn't almost positive that she would not have been en route to that location, I would think that it could be my sister...

and no, you may not have her number...but happy hunting.

I met my love on Myspace. I know...I would normally laugh at someone who found someone online. However, we connected and have been together for a year and a half and are looking ahead to the big stuff...

I can't imagine my life without her.

February 25, 2008 9:52 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Perhaps you could have tried starting a conversation with "Hey, didn't you just get on the PATH at Newark Penn? Me, too!"
It's lame, but it gives you a reason to talk to HER and not everyone else -- you are establishing something you have in common.

February 25, 2008 10:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i can understand not having the guts to talk to someone on the subway, it happens, but if you went as far as to share a cab, you could have said something. wouldn't posting her photo without her permission be a bit of a violation of privacy? she may be seeing someone

February 25, 2008 10:22 AM  
Blogger John Levenstein said...

here's what i really think: women who think that, when they get together with a man, it just somehow happens, are usually not appreciating all the heavy lifting men put in. what jack is doing here is what men do all the time leading up to a conversation. the only difference is that here the conversation didn't happen. in my case, i might have clammed up for fear of exposing the fact i'd been focused on her for a while.

February 25, 2008 10:35 AM  
Blogger John Levenstein said...

anonymous #5, if anonymous #3 can't tell if the picture is of her sister or not, i think we're in safe hands.

February 25, 2008 10:42 AM  
Blogger Jack Silbert said...

We may all thank my friends at nj.com for the spike in traffic, some more erudite than others. And I only posted the photos as I felt she was not recognizable.

February 25, 2008 10:45 AM  
Blogger Bernie said...

Welcome NJ.com!
Actually, most of us are out here in California and probably don't know what a PATH train is.

February 25, 2008 11:01 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think all of u been leavin a crazy life because what this man is doing is stalking and that is what psyco's do.... You can get into alot of trouble for taking someones picture u FREAK!!!!!!

February 25, 2008 11:26 AM  
Blogger John Levenstein said...

welcome, anonymous #6?

February 25, 2008 11:28 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymouses #2 & #6, I am so with you that he's stalking her! Sort of like how if a man stares at a woman too long, he's raping her - but with his eyes! It doesn't matter if it's his eyes instead of his dick - it's still rape!!!

February 25, 2008 11:38 AM  
Blogger Chris said...

anonymous #6 and all other anonymeeese (anonymooses?) welcome to SaltInWound! Now, please, shed the anonymity and start making some relevant points here. Then again, I can understand wanting to retain the anonymous stature when such cogent thoughts as, "u been leavin a crazy life" and "u FREAK!!!!!!!" are the sum of your contributions.

(sorry, John, I'm just cranky today, don't mean to ward of such worthy potential contributors to the site : )

February 25, 2008 11:41 AM  
Blogger robert said...

Chris: I've seen anonymice used, which I like.

February 25, 2008 11:47 AM  
Blogger Bernie said...

Jack, next time sketch a picture of her instead.

February 25, 2008 11:55 AM  
Blogger Jack Silbert said...

Luckily i am also very attracted to stick figures.

February 25, 2008 12:10 PM  
Blogger John Levenstein said...

if we've proved anything, jack, it's that your powers of projection are fantastic.

February 25, 2008 12:13 PM  
Blogger robert said...

Interesting how the comments by the nj.com people here are mostly discouraging and anonymous, while the comments at nj.com are mostly encouraging and signed. I don't know what that means but it did strike me.

Also, don't any of you nj.com people have anything to say about how I refused to mail my sperm? Don't be shy - I'll take you all on!

February 25, 2008 12:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A guy above pointed out that we girls should understand the effort poor guys make.

Sure, but it's totally based on looks. The author knew nothing at all about the girl. He was hoping that the mag was the New Yorker, but he was willing to trail her anyway; more importantly, she was a thin, pretty girl. Let's be honest.

February 25, 2008 1:09 PM  
Blogger John Levenstein said...

anonymous #7, that's very fair

February 25, 2008 1:14 PM  
Blogger robert said...

John, I think you're miscounting the anonymice. For the record:

Anonymice #1, #2, & #6: the best that can be said is that they aren't particularly supportive of our friend Jack.

Anonymice #3, #4, & #5: generally supportive and have good suggestions.

Anonymouse #7: For real? Just a troll? Hard to tell what she's thinking.

Anonymouse #8: constructively critical and well reasoned.

John, I believe what you addressed to #7 was actually meant for #8.

February 25, 2008 2:16 PM  
Blogger carli said...

This sort of reminds me of the time the jerky guy on the very crowded subway wouldn't hold onto one of the bars because he was too busy enjoying his chocolate milk. I was sure he was going to either fall on me or spill chocolate milk on me. And he had a luggage tag on his bag, from which I loaded his address and phone number onto my cell phone. And I planned to leave him a message about subway food etiquette or just clandestinely send him a plush NesQuik bunny with the head cut off, but I sort of forgot all about it. Until now. It would be funny if your girl got together with that guy.

February 25, 2008 2:31 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

Carli,

From what you've included in your anecdote, it's hard to see what your beef really was with this man. Was he bumping into you repeatedly? Did he ever spill any milk on you? It seems that neither of these thins transpired, so it's hard for me to muster any sympathy for you.

I do, however, have a great deal of sympathy for the chocolate milk drinker. Being a fan of Nesquik myself, I understand his need to gulp the drink down while it still had that nice, crisp, chilled quality to it. The warmer it gets, the less enjoyable it is.

Also, sending him a Nesquick bunny with the head cut off... well, now that really is just plain creepy. Especially out of context. Very Glenn Close of you.

February 25, 2008 2:58 PM  
Blogger John Levenstein said...

chris, your grumpiness took over for a second there. if carli thought the guy might spill chocolate milk on her, then it was possible. and carli was aiming him like a guided missile at jack's mousy object of desire, not at jack himself.

February 25, 2008 3:04 PM  
Blogger Ken L. said...

Okay, Robert, nobody else bit so I'll chime in. It was a little more information than I needed!
And, Jack, I've been delighted at all the wonderfully well considered anonymous comments and gems of advice that your post engendered! What a treat!
It's always nice to read the opinions of those who are so exhilaratingly unencumbered by the burden of intellect. And, Jack - she was probably a raging bitch anyway.

February 25, 2008 3:10 PM  
Blogger Bernie said...

If any lady would like to stalk Jack on his ride home, or just happen to get in a cab with him and the end of a long, hard day, send your post and pics to 'more at saltinwound.com' and we'll be sure to put it up!

February 25, 2008 3:10 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

John, I was always taught: There's no use crying over spilt milk. So, if that be true, how can one cry over milk that was never truly spilt?

Don't undermine my midwest upbringing, John. I simply won't allow it.

February 25, 2008 3:49 PM  
Blogger Robert said...

Chris, it's not about the unsplit milk, it's about the unheld-onto bar. With or without the milk, when you're standing on a subway you should always hold onto the bar.

February 25, 2008 4:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting how the comments by the nj.com people here are mostly discouraging and anonymous, while the comments at nj.com are mostly encouraging and signed. I don't know what that means but it did strike me.

Because Salt in Wound isn't yet blocking anonymous comments.

February 25, 2008 4:19 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

This post has been removed by the author.

February 25, 2008 10:13 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

Robert,

Funny, but I feel like when you're standing on the subway you should always hold on to the woman directly in front of you. Especially if she's really hot. If you can manage to drink chocolate milk while doing this, more power to you.

February 25, 2008 10:20 PM  
Blogger Robert said...

Chris, already your posts are more positive! If I were a woman on a subway, and you were Jack writing that last post, I would totally want to meet you.

February 25, 2008 10:25 PM  
Blogger Robert said...

Maybe we need some kind of trophy, like a little statuette of a gaping wound covered in salt, and whoever makes the post that has the most comments receives the trophy from the previous owner. Jack, if this persists, you're about to overtake my valentines day post (51).

If I had such a trophy, I could send it to you in either a vial or a ziploc bag. It's your choice!

February 25, 2008 10:29 PM  
Blogger John said...

I think a lot of us are attracted to other folks on the subway, on a bus, in line at the bank. It's familiar to a lot of folks.

I love Jack. A lot. But dude, you had to take advantage of the cab sitch.

Mystery Girl, if you are out there, Jack is a good guy and I personally vouch for him. If you would like, I would gladly chaperone a meeting in a public place.

February 26, 2008 8:17 AM  
Blogger carli said...

The subway was very crowded. And since it was an Express, it was going quite fast. I just didn't think it was the time nor the place to be drinking chocolate milk. And I wasn't genuinely furious, but miffed. Then the train stopped for a while, and I decided to take down his information. Any "revenge" I would have taken would have been in fun. . . for me, at least.

I've never even SEEN Fatal Attraction, although I understand it contains a clip from "You Can't Do That On Television."

And now Jack will say, "It's amazing how you've managed to make this thread about you." Which is true, to an extent.

February 26, 2008 8:48 AM  
Blogger Robert said...

50 comments: Viva Cuba!

And I still have no idea what that means.

February 26, 2008 9:01 AM  
Blogger Bernie said...

Castro stepped down on the day I wrote that comment, Robert. Not so impossible to make the connection.

February 26, 2008 9:22 AM  
Blogger Robert said...

Bernie, your comment that day was

> I'm going to kick this to fifty, just for Cuba. Viva!

as if 50 was some kind of special Cuba number. If that's not what you meant, and you were just starting a tradition of dedicating comments to events of the day, then this comment is dedicated to Kofi Annan's frustration with Kenya.

February 26, 2008 9:38 AM  

<< Home