moral dilemmas all around
Last night, I was at a dinner party for the writers of Lipstick Jungle. We finished writing six episodes before the strike started, and now they're shooting them in New York. It felt like a scene from the Way We Were--some writers are much more adamant about the strike, others are more casual and have even visited the set (all while carefully not writing, I'm sure). The showrunner has been on set a lot; he is a hero in the network's eyes.
In February, we go on the air in E.R.'s timeslot. That should be great news for our target audience of powerful women balancing their careers and their personal lives. But the writers of E.R. are pissed. Their showrunner shut down production when the strike started. Because they're not producing fresh episodes, our show was able to step in.
Then I went to a fancy Depression-era theme party in an amazing house with a live jug band and fancy soup (in support of the strike, I guess). I talked to a guy who's run the Simpsons on and off for twenty years. He has one percent of the profits in the show. And Fox is still claiming the show isn't in profits! He was going to audit, but then it turned out the audit would have had to go through Jim Brooks, so then it went away. I feel something like that happened with him and Tracey Ullman years ago.
The shittiest working conditions of my life were directly due to a narcissistic writer/showrunner with a pathological need to control time by defying its very limits.
I hope we get everything we want out of the strike against management. But no one screws over writers like other writers.
Labels: strike
posted by John Levenstein at
11:09 AM
8 Comments:
John, I see Lipstick Jungle shooting up by my work occasionally. Would dropping your name get me to the catering table? Can you help a brother(in law) out?
as long as you understand there are moral implications to every bite you take.
I promise I won't enjoy it.
John, agreed on that last sentiment about writers being the best at screwing over other writers. Just like Democrats are the best at figuring out how to beat themselves each election.
I realized after our phone conversations that I can just use my already existent blogger account to post comments here.
-Chris Cox
Okay, now that I'm here I suppose should verify that I am "invited" for sure. I'm hopping over to Bernie's post to get fully accredited as an approved poster. Wish me luck.
chris, you can comment, but i think bernie has to invite you for you to post, i'll have her send you the info
one other thing that happened at the party: a showrunner tried to explain to me on what basis they were deciding who goes to the "showrunner" meetings. I ended up more confused than ever and a little insulted.
Yes, it seems to me that the least unifying thing a union can do is to hold exclusory meetings that marginalize certain members. I understand and appreciate the need to codify support amongst the higher ups as well as the middle and lower rung folks, but if it starts to give the appearance of a popularity contest it can do damage.
Post a Comment
<< Home